What to Have Ready 30/60/90 Days Before the Assessor Walks In
By Leonard Esere, Founder — AeoliTech
April 2026
Abstract
The C3PAO assessment is not a surprise inspection — it is a structured, professional process with defined documentation requirements, a known evaluation methodology, and a predictable set of evidence requests. Organizations that approach their assessment prepared consistently achieve better outcomes than those who treat it as an exam they are trying to pass at the last minute. The difference between a Final Level 2 (C3PAO) certification and a Conditional certification with an extensive POA&M is almost always a matter of preparation quality, not security implementation quality.
This guide provides a concrete 90/60/30-day countdown framework for organizations approaching a CMMC Level 2 certification assessment. It covers C3PAO selection criteria and the authorized marketplace, the assessor's perspective and methodology drawn from the CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2, the evidence vault structure required for efficient document review, how to prepare personnel for assessor interviews, the value of a mock (dry-run) assessment, common findings that drive conditional certifications, the corrective action window and POA&M closeout process, and indicative cost ranges for assessment services. The goal is to ensure that when the Lead Certified CMMC Assessor arrives — physically or virtually — the organization is ready to demonstrate compliance, not describe intentions.
Table of Contents
1. The C3PAO Assessment: What It Is and Who Does It
2. C3PAO Selection: The Authorized Marketplace and What to Evaluate
3. What Assessors Actually Do: The Assessment Methodology
4. The 90-Day Readiness Countdown
5. The 60-Day Readiness Countdown
6. The 30-Day Readiness Countdown
7. Evidence Vault Structure
8. Preparing Personnel for Assessor Interviews
9. The Value of a Mock Assessment
10. Common Findings and How to Remediate Before Assessment Day
11. Conditional Certification and the 180-Day Closeout Window
12. Assessment Cost Ranges and What Drives Them
13. About the Author
14. References
1. The C3PAO Assessment: What It Is and Who Does It
A CMMC Level 2 certification assessment is a formal conformity assessment conducted by an accredited Third-Party Assessment Organization (C3PAO) to determine whether an Organization Seeking Certification (OSC) meets all 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 security requirements within its defined CMMC Assessment Scope. The assessment methodology and procedures are defined in the CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2 (DoD CIO), and the results are transmitted to eMASS and reflected in the Supplier Performance Risk System (SPRS).
Assessment Outcomes
Under 32 CFR § 170.17, the possible outcomes of a Level 2 certification assessment are:
| Outcome | Condition | Validity |
|---|---|---|
| Final Level 2 (C3PAO) | All 110 requirements met (or properly NOT APPLICABLE) | 3 years from assessment date; annual affirmation required |
| Conditional Level 2 (C3PAO) | SPRS score ≥ 88; remaining POA&M items are only 1-point controls | 180 days to POA&M closeout; then C3PAO conducts closeout assessment |
| Assessment Not Completed | Fundamental scope issues, SSP absent, or systemic failures | Organization must remediate and reschedule |
Who Conducts the Assessment
A C3PAO must employ at a minimum:
- One (1) Lead Certified CMMC Assessor (LCCA) who leads the assessment team
- One (1) Certified CMMC Assessor (CCA) team member
- One (1) CCA designated as quality reviewer
The C3PAO must have passed a CMMC Level 2 assessment conducted by DCMA DIBCAC, hold ISO 17021 certification, have passed a DCSA FOCI review, and carry minimum cyber insurance. All authorized C3PAOs are listed on the Cyber AB Marketplace.
2. C3PAO Selection: The Authorized Marketplace and What to Evaluate
All C3PAOs authorized to conduct Level 2 certification assessments are listed on the Cyber AB Marketplace. The Cyber AB is the sole official partner of DoD for registration, accreditation, and oversight of the CMMC Ecosystem. Any organization claiming to offer CMMC certification assessments that is not listed on the Cyber AB Marketplace is not authorized to do so — and a certification from an unauthorized assessor is not valid.
C3PAO Authorization Requirements (per Cyber AB)
| Requirement | Details |
|---|---|
| DIBCAC Assessment | Must pass CMMC Level 2 assessment by DCMA DIBCAC every 3 years |
| ISO 17021 Accreditation | Conformity assessment body accreditation |
| FOCI Review | DCSA Foreign Ownership, Control, or Influence review every 3 years |
| Application fee | $6,000 to Cyber AB |
| Insurance | General Liability ($1M+), E&O ($1M+), Cybersecurity breach policy |
| Personnel | At least 1 LCCA and 1 CCA on staff |
| Cyber AB Agreement | Signed C3PAO Agreement and Code of Professional Conduct |
What to Evaluate When Selecting a C3PAO
Authorization status is a baseline, not a differentiator. Beyond authorization, evaluate:
| Factor | Why It Matters | How to Assess |
|---|---|---|
| Industry experience | A C3PAO that has assessed similar organizations understands your technology stack | Ask directly; request references from comparable organizations |
| Assessment team composition | The specific assessors matter, not just the organization | Ask to meet the proposed lead assessor; verify LCCA certification on Cyber AB site |
| Scheduling availability | Assessment queues run 8–12 weeks from engagement to start | Ask for current scheduling lead time upfront |
| Pre-assessment support | Some C3PAOs offer readiness reviews; others do not | Determine whether they will review your SSP before the assessment |
| Assessment scope understanding | Do they understand your environment (OT/ICS, cloud-native, multi-site)? | Provide a brief environment overview in your initial discussion |
| Pricing structure | Fixed-fee vs. time-and-materials matters for budget certainty | Request a detailed written statement of work |
| Communication quality | The engagement before assessment day predicts the engagement during it | Evaluate responsiveness and clarity in initial interactions |
Assessment Fee Ranges
Indicative CMMC Level 2 certification assessment fees from authorized C3PAOs currently range from approximately $30,000 to $100,000 for the assessment itself, exclusive of preparation services. Fee drivers include:
- Number of in-scope assets
- Number of assessment locations (multi-site assessments cost more)
- Environment complexity (cloud-heavy environments require additional time)
- Whether the C3PAO performs a pre-assessment readiness review
- Travel costs for on-site assessment activities
| Organization Profile | Indicative Assessment Fee |
|---|---|
| Small org, single site, 20–50 in-scope assets | $30,000–$50,000 |
| Mid-size org, single/dual site, 50–200 assets | $45,000–$75,000 |
| Large org, multi-site, complex environment | $60,000–$100,000+ |
3. What Assessors Actually Do: The Assessment Methodology
The CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2 (DoD CIO, Version 2.13 or current) is the assessor's manual. Understanding it from the assessor's perspective transforms preparation from guesswork into a structured readiness exercise.
Assessment Methods
For each of the 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements and their corresponding 320 assessment objectives in 800-171A, assessors apply three methods:
| Method | Description | What Assessors Are Looking For |
|---|---|---|
| Examine | Review documentation, policies, configurations, records | Existence, completeness, consistency, and currency of artifacts |
| Interview | Question personnel responsible for the control | Ability to describe implementation without reading from SSP; knowledge of procedures |
| Test | Technical verification of implementation | Actual controls function as documented; vulnerabilities are not present |
Most Level 2 controls require all three methods. The combination of examine + interview + test is what makes CMMC assessments genuinely rigorous. An assessor who reviews a well-written MFA policy (examine), interviews the IT administrator who explains how MFA was deployed (interview), then tests a login attempt and confirms MFA is enforced (test) has applied the full methodology.
Finding Categories
| Finding | Definition | Impact |
|---|---|---|
| MET | All applicable assessment objectives for the requirement are satisfied | Positive; contributes to SPRS score |
| NOT MET | One or more assessment objectives are not satisfied | Negative; SPRS deduction; POA&M required if conditional certification sought |
| NOT APPLICABLE | The requirement does not apply to the organization's environment | Neutral; must be documented and justified |
Assessment Timeline
A typical C3PAO assessment for a mid-size organization runs:
- Pre-assessment documentation review: 1–2 weeks (remote)
- On-site/virtual assessment: 3–7 business days
- Draft findings report: 1–2 weeks after assessment
- Final report and SPRS/eMASS upload: 1–2 weeks after findings review
4. The 90-Day Readiness Countdown
At 90 days out, the focus is on completing any outstanding technical remediation, finalizing documentation, and engaging the C3PAO.
90-Day Checklist
| Category | Action Item | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | Confirm SSP is complete for all 110 controls with implementation narratives and evidence references | ISSO |
| Documentation | POA&M is current, cross-referenced to SSP, with realistic milestones | ISSO |
| Documentation | All referenced policy documents exist, are current, and are approved | ISSO/System Owner |
| Technical | MFA is deployed for all privileged and network access (3-point control) | System Administrator |
| Technical | FIPS-validated encryption is enforced for CUI in transit and at rest (5-point control) | System Administrator |
| Technical | Vulnerability scanning is current (within 30 days for high-risk systems) | IT Security |
| Technical | Audit logging is confirmed active on all in-scope systems | System Administrator |
| Technical | Patch status is current; no critical/high unpatched vulnerabilities on in-scope systems | System Administrator |
| C3PAO | C3PAO selected and contract executed | Management/Procurement |
| C3PAO | Assessment scheduling confirmed; on-site dates blocked | ISSO/Management |
| C3PAO | Pre-assessment documentation package prepared for C3PAO review | ISSO |
| SPRS | Current SPRS self-assessment score posted; affirming official attestation submitted | Affirming Official |
| Personnel | Key personnel notified of assessment schedule and their potential interview role | ISSO/Management |
Pre-Assessment Documentation Package for C3PAO
Submit this package to the C3PAO at the 90-day mark:
- Current SSP (all versions; mark current version clearly)
- Current POA&M
- Network architecture diagram
- Asset inventory (CUI assets, security protection assets, contractor risk managed assets)
- CUI data flow diagram
- List of external service providers and cloud services
- List of personnel roles involved in CUI operations
5. The 60-Day Readiness Countdown
At 60 days out, conduct your mock assessment, collect fresh evidence, and begin intensive personnel preparation.
60-Day Checklist
| Category | Action Item | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Mock Assessment | Conduct full internal dry-run using 800-171A assessment objectives | ISSO + external RPO/consultant |
| Mock Assessment | Document all findings from mock assessment; remediate before actual assessment | ISSO |
| Evidence Vault | Collect fresh evidence for all controls (screenshots, reports, logs dated within 60 days) | ISSO + IT team |
| Evidence Vault | Organize evidence by control family and requirement number | ISSO |
| Evidence Vault | Verify every SSP evidence reference points to a file that exists in the vault | ISSO |
| Technical | Re-run vulnerability scan; remediate findings before assessment | IT Security |
| Technical | Verify network segmentation is enforced (attempt connection from non-CUI to CUI segment) | Network Engineer |
| Technical | Review and update asset inventory; confirm no new in-scope assets added without SSP update | System Administrator |
| Documentation | Update SSP for any system changes made during remediation | ISSO |
| Personnel | Conduct CUI awareness refresher training for all in-scope personnel | ISSO/Training Lead |
| Personnel | Hold initial interview prep session: review control responsibilities with key staff | ISSO |
| C3PAO | Respond to C3PAO's pre-assessment questions/clarifications | ISSO |
| C3PAO | Confirm logistics: on-site vs. virtual, room setup, assessor access requirements | ISSO/Facilities |
6. The 30-Day Readiness Countdown
At 30 days out, finalize all preparation. No new major system changes.
30-Day Checklist
| Category | Action Item | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Documentation | Freeze the SSP version to be assessed; version-stamp and distribute | ISSO |
| Documentation | Conduct final SSP consistency review: diagrams match narrative; asset counts match inventory | ISSO |
| Documentation | Confirm POA&M is current and all closed items are documented as closed | ISSO |
| Evidence Vault | Final evidence collection sweep; ensure all artifacts are dated within 60 days | ISSO + IT team |
| Evidence Vault | Create assessor navigation guide: table mapping each control to specific evidence files | ISSO |
| Personnel | Conduct role-specific interview prep for ISSO, System Admin, Network Engineer, CISO | ISSO |
| Personnel | Brief management on assessment process, timeline, and outcomes | ISSO/Management |
| Personnel | Confirm availability of all key personnel during assessment days | Management |
| Technical | Final patch cycle; document patch status | IT Security |
| Technical | Verify all monitoring and alerting is active; clear false positives from alert queues | IT Security |
| Technical | Confirm audit log integrity and retention are functioning | System Administrator |
| Logistics | Prepare private workspace for assessors (virtual or physical) | Facilities/IT |
| Logistics | Ensure assessors have the access they need (credentials, VPN, system access) | System Administrator |
| Communications | Brief all personnel who may interact with assessors on professional conduct | ISSO/Management |
What to Stop Doing in the 30-Day Window
- Do not make significant architectural changes to in-scope systems
- Do not change SSP control status without documenting the change and updating evidence
- Do not deploy new third-party services that add to assessment scope
- Do not allow personnel leaves that would make key interview candidates unavailable during assessment days
7. Evidence Vault Structure
The evidence vault is the organized collection of artifacts that supports every SSP implementation narrative. It should be prepared and organized before the C3PAO receives the documentation package.
Evidence Vault Organization
`
/evidence-vault/
/README.md ← Navigation guide: control → evidence filename mapping
/AC-Access-Control/
3.1.1-limit-system-access/
access-control-policy-v2.3-2025-09.pdf
ad-privileged-group-membership-2025-10-15.csv
user-access-review-Q3-2025-signed.pdf
3.1.2-limit-CUI-access/
data-classification-policy-v1.1.pdf
CUI-folder-permissions-export-2025-10.txt
[... all 22 AC requirements ...]
/AT-Awareness-Training/
/AU-Audit-Accountability/
/CM-Configuration-Management/
[... all 14 control families ...]
/network-diagrams/
network-architecture-v3.2-2025-09.pdf
CUI-data-flow-v2.1-2025-09.pdf
/asset-inventories/
in-scope-asset-inventory-2025-10-15.xlsx
/policies/
[all policy documents indexed]
/third-party-providers/
ESP-inventory-with-FedRAMP-status.pdf
[CRM documents for each ESP]
`
Evidence Quality Standards
| Standard | Requirement |
|---|---|
| Currency | Evidence should be dated within 60 days of the assessment date |
| Completeness | Every control narrative in the SSP must have corresponding evidence in the vault |
| Legibility | Screenshots must be high resolution; configuration exports must be readable |
| Context | Evidence should be self-explanatory or annotated to clarify what it demonstrates |
| Integrity | Do not alter evidence artifacts; timestamp-verified originals are more credible than modified copies |
| Access | Assessors must be able to navigate the vault without assistance from the OSC |
The navigation guide (README.md or equivalent) is highly valued by assessors. A table that maps each control number to specific file paths in the vault reduces assessment friction and demonstrates organizational maturity.
8. Preparing Personnel for Assessor Interviews
Personnel interviews are the assessment method most often under-prepared. Organizations spend weeks polishing their SSP and evidence vault, then discover that the System Administrator cannot describe how MFA was configured without reading from a note.
Who Will Be Interviewed
Assessors will typically seek to interview:
- ISSO (Information System Security Officer) — broad scope; will be asked about overall security posture, SSP development, monitoring processes
- System Administrator(s) — technical controls: user account management, patch management, backup procedures, configuration management
- Network Engineer — network architecture, segmentation controls, firewall configuration, boundary protection
- IT Security Analyst — SIEM monitoring, incident response, vulnerability management
- HR / Personnel Security representative — background screening procedures, termination processes
- Facilities representative — physical access controls, visitor management
Interview Preparation Approach
For each personnel role, conduct a focused 60-minute prep session:
1. Review the SSP sections relevant to their role
2. Walk through the specific assessment objectives associated with their controls
3. Practice answering the likely interview questions (see sample questions below)
4. Emphasize: describe what you actually do, not what the policy says
Sample Assessor Interview Questions by Control Area
| Control Area | Sample Questions |
|---|---|
| Access Control | "How are privileged accounts managed? Walk me through how a new privileged account is created and removed." |
| Audit & Accountability | "What events does your SIEM alert on? How would you know if an unauthorized user accessed a CUI file?" |
| Configuration Management | "What process do you follow before deploying a new system to the CUI environment? How do you manage baseline configurations?" |
| Incident Response | "Describe what would happen if you detected unusual access to CUI files at 2 AM. Who would you call? What would you document?" |
| MFA | "Is MFA enforced for all methods of accessing CUI systems? What happens if someone tries to log in without completing MFA?" |
| Patch Management | "How do you know which systems have unpatched critical vulnerabilities? How quickly do you patch?" |
| Physical Security | "Who has access to the server room? How is visitor access controlled in the facility?" |
The Golden Rule of Interview Preparation
Personnel should be able to describe their controls in plain language. If an employee's honest answer to a question reveals that they don't actually do what the SSP says — that's a finding, and it should have been discovered in the mock assessment, not during the actual assessment.
9. The Value of a Mock Assessment
A mock assessment — also called a dry run, internal assessment, or readiness assessment — is the single highest-value preparation activity available to an organization in the 60 days before the formal C3PAO assessment. Its value exceeds that of any documentation improvement or technical configuration change made in the same timeframe, because it reveals gaps that cannot be detected through self-review.
What a Mock Assessment Covers
A credible mock assessment replicates the C3PAO methodology:
- Evaluates all 110 NIST SP 800-171 Rev 2 requirements using the 320 assessment objectives in 800-171A
- Applies examine, interview, and test methods
- Documents findings in the same format as C3PAO findings (MET, NOT MET, NOT APPLICABLE)
- Produces a pre-assessment SPRS score projection
- Identifies interview readiness gaps alongside technical and documentation gaps
Who Should Conduct the Mock Assessment
An internal mock assessment conducted entirely by the team that developed the SSP has limited value — they already know what it says. The most effective mock assessments are conducted by:
- An external Registered Practitioner Organization (RPO) with CMMC assessment experience
- A qualified individual independent from the SSP development team
- In some cases, the C3PAO itself, if they offer a paid readiness review (note: some C3PAOs prohibit this to maintain independence)
Mock Assessment ROI
Every NOT MET finding discovered in a mock assessment is a finding that does not appear in the C3PAO assessment. The cost of remediating a finding before the assessment — in labor and configuration changes — is substantially lower than the cost of a finding that drives a POA&M, a conditional certification, and a closeout assessment 90–180 days later.
My experience across classified government environments and commercial DIB organizations consistently confirms: organizations that conduct a rigorous mock assessment 6–8 weeks before the C3PAO arrive with fewer than half the findings of organizations that do not.
10. Common Findings and How to Remediate Before Assessment Day
The following findings appear consistently across CMMC Level 2 certification assessments. Remediating these before the assessment converts potential NOT MET findings into confirmed MET findings.
High-Priority Findings (3 and 5-point controls)
| Requirement | Common Finding | Remediation |
|---|---|---|
| IA.L2-3.5.3 (MFA) | MFA not enforced for network access to non-privileged accounts; MFA bypass paths exist | Enforce MFA at authentication layer, not just at application layer; eliminate bypass paths |
| SC.L2-3.13.8 (Encryption in Transit) | Non-FIPS-validated encryption protocols in use (TLS 1.0/1.1, non-validated cipher suites) | Configure TLS 1.2 minimum with FIPS-approved cipher suites; use FIPS-validated modules |
| SC.L2-3.13.10 (Key Management) | Cryptographic key management process not documented or keys not rotated | Document key management procedures; implement rotation schedule |
| IR.L2-3.6.2 (Incident Reporting) | DoD incident reporting procedures (per DFARS 252.204-7012) not documented or practiced | Update IR plan with specific DoD reporting requirements; conduct tabletop |
| CA.L2-3.12.1 (Security Assessments) | No periodic security assessments documented; last assessment predates CMMC rule | Schedule and document annual security assessment; retain results |
Medium-Priority Findings (1-point controls, but frequently missed)
| Requirement | Common Finding | Remediation |
|---|---|---|
| CM.L2-3.4.1 (Baseline Configurations) | No documented baseline configurations; ad-hoc configurations not tracked | Implement configuration baseline documentation and change management |
| AU.L2-3.3.2 (User Activity Monitoring) | No process for reviewing and acting on suspicious audit events | Implement alert thresholds in SIEM; document daily review process |
| MP.L2-3.8.3 (Media Sanitization) | No documented media sanitization process for end-of-life hardware | Implement and document media sanitization policy; maintain records |
| PS.L2-3.9.2 (Termination Procedures) | Access termination on employee departure is informal; no documented procedure | Create formal offboarding checklist with IT access termination steps |
| RA.L2-3.11.2 (Vulnerability Scanning) | Vulnerability scans not documented; no process for tracking remediation of findings | Implement scheduled scanning with documented results; track remediation to closure |
11. Conditional Certification and the 180-Day Closeout Window
If the C3PAO assessment results in outstanding POA&M items, and the conditions for conditional certification are met (SPRS score ≥ 88 at time of assessment; only 1-point controls in POA&M), the organization receives Conditional Level 2 (C3PAO) status. This status is valid for 180 days, during which all POA&M items must be fully implemented and a POA&M closeout assessment must be conducted by the same C3PAO.
Conditional Certification Management
| Task | Timeline | Owner |
|---|---|---|
| Document conditional status in SPRS | Immediately after assessment | C3PAO (uploads to eMASS) |
| Develop detailed remediation plan with milestones | Within 30 days of assessment | ISSO |
| Begin POA&M item remediation | Immediately | IT/Security team |
| Conduct periodic POA&M status reviews | Monthly | ISSO/Management |
| Submit evidence of remediation to C3PAO | Per agreed schedule | ISSO |
| Schedule POA&M closeout assessment | No later than week 20 of the 180-day window | ISSO/Management |
| Complete all POA&M items | Before closeout assessment date | IT/Security team |
| POA&M closeout assessment conducted | Before day 180 | C3PAO |
| Final Level 2 (C3PAO) status issued | Upon successful closeout assessment | C3PAO (uploads to eMASS) |
If the 180-Day Window Is Missed
If POA&M items are not closed within 180 days, the conditional certification lapses. The organization loses its CMMC Level 2 (C3PAO) status and must undergo a full reassessment. This is a serious commercial risk: contracts requiring Level 2 certification may be terminated, and new awards will not be available until full reassessment is completed. Do not approach the 180-day window casually.
12. Assessment Cost Ranges and What Drives Them
Total Assessment-Phase Costs
The "assessment" cost includes more than the C3PAO fee:
| Cost Component | Typical Range | Driver |
|---|---|---|
| C3PAO assessment fee | $30,000–$100,000 | Scope, complexity, number of sites, environment type |
| Pre-assessment readiness review (optional) | $8,000–$25,000 | Separate engagement; some C3PAOs offer this; some RPOs offer as preparation service |
| Internal preparation labor | $15,000–$50,000+ | Time of ISSO, IT staff, and management preparing documentation and supporting assessment |
| Mock assessment | $10,000–$30,000 | External RPO or consultant conducting structured dry run |
| POA&M remediation (if conditional) | $10,000–$100,000+ | Depends on what was not met; 5-point controls left unresolved are expensive to fix post-assessment |
| POA&M closeout assessment fee | $10,000–$30,000 | If applicable; reduced scope vs. full assessment |
Factors That Increase Assessment Cost
- Multiple physical assessment locations
- Large number of in-scope assets
- Complex cloud environments with multiple CSPs
- Specialized or OT/ICS environments requiring specialized assessor expertise
- Scope changes discovered during assessment
- Extensive POA&M remediation required
Factors That Reduce Assessment Cost
- Well-organized evidence vault with clear navigation guide
- Complete, accurate SSP with detailed narratives
- Low number of NOT MET findings from mock assessment
- Single-site, cloud-first environment with clean architecture
- Experienced ISSO who efficiently supports the assessment process
The investment in preparation — mock assessment, SSP quality, evidence vault organization — directly reduces assessment cost and risk. An organization that presents a polished evidence vault and an SSP that answers every assessor question before it is asked will complete the document review phase in half the time of an unprepared organization.
About the Author
Leonard Esere is the Founder of AeoliTech, a cybersecurity and compliance advisory firm specializing in DoD compliance programs for the Defense Industrial Base. With DoD Secret and DoE Q clearances, Leonard has led assessment preparation programs across some of the most demanding assessment environments in the federal government — including full ATO execution at Los Alamos National Laboratory and CMMC framework development through MITRE. He has been on both sides of the assessment table: building the documentation that assessors evaluate, and evaluating compliance programs against rigorous federal standards. His practical knowledge of what assessors actually look for informs every element of this guide.
References
1. CMMC Assessment Guide Level 2, Version 2.13 — DoD CIO
2. 32 CFR Part 170 — CMMC Program Final Rule (eCFR)
3. 32 CFR § 170.17 — Level 2 Certification Assessment Requirements (Cornell LII)
4. Cyber AB — C3PAO Authorization Requirements
5. Cyber AB Marketplace — Authorized C3PAOs
6. NIST SP 800-171A Revision 2 — Assessing Security Requirements for CUI
7. SPRS — NIST SP 800-171 Assessment Module (DISA)
8. DoD CIO — CMMC Program Overview and Documentation
9. Federal Register — CMMC Final Rule, October 15, 2024
10. DFARS 252.204-7012 — Safeguarding Covered Defense Information and Cyber Incident Reporting
> Ready to schedule your C3PAO assessment?
>
> AeoliTech supports organizations through the full assessment lifecycle: mock assessments, evidence vault organization, personnel interview preparation, C3PAO coordination, and POA&M closeout support.
>
> - Schedule a CMMC Gap Assessment → /services/cmmc-gap-assessment